Time and again spirited discussions take place on internet fora regarding an examination of the status of a variety of jyotish parameters, including chara dasha (a signal based cortical period astrofactor) along with karakamsha (that the navamsha where the atmakaraka (most complex planet in longitude) is set. As characteristically happens, a number of the discussants begun to branch to other negative discussions which really had nothing to do with all the initial questions or issues along with some became a bit resolved and emotional, as also frequently happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks have been demanded to be able to get into the underside of matters and where some times a topic is being discussed on several different boards and lots of issues simultaneously on a given board! As too is typical, nothing has been really resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about these issues coming up again and again again and directing people to archives etc.. Unfortunately, the yahoo forums/fora are such that only limited searching of previous messages is possible without losing all one's hair, and the writings are often maintained onto another yahoo site and this will not help things when all one wants is to find yourself a quick summary of what others are already using and when possible their good reasons for embracing a certain position! This latter brings forth more gall than good information though the intention of the person posing the question might have been very commendable and maybe not at all confrontational. Knowing Jyotish does not protect one from harbouring Neurotic characteristics!
Somewhere, along the path of this former quest, another issue got endured and began questioning the usage of varga kundalis or varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the core of jyotish and have already been used by tropical astrologers at the form of harmonic graphs. This really is some thing which is utilized in Jyotish going back to nearly the very first memories of even the earliest members in the discussion that finally admitted to this type of situation. I myself, even though myself not that senior, have seen horoscopes that were drawn from the century before where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and thus on and much more to the point had commented on these charts in his hearing. kalyan panel chart Therefore, at least a lot of people were utilizing varga-charts even a handful of hundred years ago and possibly maybe even ahead of these times.
Somewhere through the discussion, in another of those lists, a number of those associates left available a post in which the writer had expressed notions to the contrary, i.e., vargas should not be utilised in a graph format. A conversation ensued which side stepped the important and applicable matter of the practical virtues of using of navamsha varga being an second graph. A couple of individuals asked for proofs in classics that indicates that early jyotishis urged of varga chakras. The discussants highlighted that ONLY rashi chakra must be used along with varga placements should just be useful for ascertaining the features of planets .
This was really true and also a positive step forward in the discussion. There were parallel discussions going on which were rehashing that BPHS was not original and was perhaps not a good classic and written by one or a set of'latterday saints' [my term, not the first poster!] In Jyotish and therefore can't be treated like being a classic. Evidently, there is some support for this could possibly be similarly expected if someone should happen to make a comment that Jyotish had been nothing but a derivative of Babylonian astrology that the army that was included with Alexander attracted to India. An issue that has been understood to bring even sedate jyotishis out on the"war-path!"
To those who have been interested and intrigued by this, there appeared to be just two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Just Rashi horoscopes should be properly used. Additional varga kundalis were the product of tainted comprehension of the classics - which themselves many agree may not have endured in pure form [though a number of them have thankfully lived in pretty great shape1]. Underlying that is the belief some could harbor this, alike the breeze, available Jyotish is only 1/10th of their entire body while the submerged 9/10th is mostly lost and partially hidden in the secret chambers of paramparas plus a number of the secret documents that exist nevertheless jealously guarded by the custodian families. I do not know how a lot of this iceberg postulate is established data and just how much is wishful fiction. According to the purists with the particular stream of thought, vargas MUST only be utilised as measures of quantitative and qualitative strength of planets and to that consideration of these deities and primal forces people represent BUT not in the form of a horoscope and certainly no critical consideration must be given to aspects and bhava considerations. Only for clarity, they would assert, for instance, that while the second house lord at navamsha is an important indicator, the simple fact it is set in the second navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in second house in navamsha chart) isn't significant.
(b) Regardless of if specifically clarified or perhaps not, the other flow of believing asserts that varga kundalis have a significant function to play in Jyotish and possibly are of significant utility in identifying chief mandates matters pertaining to the prescription written by sages. To put it differently, navamsha graph, by way of example, would hold significant sway over topics of marriage and spouse, while saptamsha chart would be of import in the study of children in a specific nativity's reading. These Vargas should be examined in a chart format.
I do not recall anybody in the'camp (b)' saying that the very first portion of (a) is not correct, especially, the Varga rankings have to be considered, per se, to get an study of strength and quality of a globe as prescribed over the Jyotish framework. There appeared to be some different individuals who totally denied the veracity of idea flow (b) and a few were a bit taciturn about any of this, perhaps to avoid acrimony and getting ensnared in the controversy. Or perhaps there were several other motives, known only for them.