Time and spirited discussions occur on internet fora pertaining to an examination of the status of a number of jyotish parameters( such as chara dasha (a signal based cortical period astrofactor) along with karakamsha (the navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most complex planet in longitude) is placed. As happens, a number of the discussants begun to branch to other negative discussions that really had nothing more to do with all the original questions or themes along with some even became a little resolved and emotional, as also frequently happens on the internet where attention spans of weeks and days have been required to be able to get to the bottom of things and where sometimes an interest has been discussed on a lot of different boards and several issues simultaneously on a given board! As too is typical, nothing has been resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their insecurities concerning such issues coming again and again again and directing visitors to writings . Unfortunately, the ya-hoo forums/fora are such that only limited searching of past messages is possible without losing most of one's hair, and also the archives sometimes are maintained onto yet another yahoo site which means this does not help matters when everybody wants is to get yourself a quick summary of what the others are already using and if possible their reasons for embracing a certain position! This latter usually brings about more gall than good information even though the intention of the individual posing the question may have been quite noble and maybe not at all confrontational. Knowing Jyotish does not protect one from harbouring Neurotic faculties!
Somewhere, along the path with the former quest, another issue got endured and began questioning the usage of varga kundalis or even varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the core of jyotish and have already been used by tropical astrologers at the form of harmonic charts. Now this is something that is employed in Jyotish going straight back to almost the initial memories of even the earliest members at the discussion that finally confessed to such being the situation. I myself, though myself perhaps not that senior, have experienced horoscopes that were drawn from the century before last where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and therefore forth and more to the point had commented on these graphs in his reading. kalyan panel chart So, at the very least a lot of people had been utilizing varga-charts even a handful of hundred years ago and possibly even just before these times.
Somewhere through the discussion, in just one of these lists, one of the associates left available an article in which the author had expressed thoughts to the contrary, i.e., vargas should not be utilised in a graph format. A discussion ensued which sidestepped the important and relevant matter of the technical merits of using of navamsha varga being a secondary chart. A couple of individuals requested for accusations in classics which indicates that early jyotishis urged of varga chakras. The discussants highlighted that ONLY rashi chakra must be used along with varga placements should just be useful for determining the strengths of planets .
Nowadays, those who have studied BPHS might know, that 16 vargas were defined by the Sage you start with rashi ehich is also known as'kshetra' (field or area) and so on. One of those members attracted to all astrologers' attention that Parashara had clarified very plainly how to find out bhavas in the rashi chart (ascendant, 10th dwelling and then trisection of the arcs, etc. in Chapter V of BPHS). This was really true and a positive step ahead of the conversation. There were parallel discussions going which were rehashing that BPHS wasn't original and was not a good classic and compiled by one or even a group of'latter day saints' [my term, not the original poster's!] In Jyotish and for that reason cannot be treated as being a classic. Apparently, there is some support to this as could possibly be similarly expected if somebody should happen to create a comment that Jyotish had been only a derivative of Babylonian astrology which the army that was included with Alexander attracted to India. An issue that has been proven to bring even untoward jyotishis on the"war-path!"
To those who were still interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there looked to be two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Just Rashi horoscopes should be properly used. Other varga kundalis were the product of corrupted comprehension of the classics which themselves many concur might not have endured in pristine shape [while a number of these have mercifully survived in pretty great shape1]. I do not know how much of the iceberg postulate is established facts and just how much is wishful fiction. According to the purists with this stream of thought, vargas MUST only be applied as measures of qualitative and quantitative strength of planets and to that consideration of the deities and primal forces those represent however, maybe not at the form of a horoscope and certainly no significant consideration has to be directed at aspects along with bhava considerations. Only for clarity, they would maintain, for instance, that while the 2nd dwelling lord at navamsha is a significant index, the fact it is placed in the next navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in 2 nd house in navamsha chart) isn't important.
(b) Irrespective of if explicitly clarified or maybe not, the other stream of thinking maintains that varga kundalis have a significant function to play at Jyotish and possibly are of significant usefulness in differentiating primary mandates matters pertaining to the prescription written by sages. To put it differently, navamsha chart, as an instance, would hold significant sway within matters of marriage and spouse, whilst saptamsha graph are of import at the study of children in a specific nativity's reading. All these Vargas should be examined in a graph format.
I don't really recall anyone in the'camp (b)' saying that the first portion of (a) isn't correct, especially, the Varga rankings have to be considered, by itself, for an study of strength and high quality of an entire globe as prescribed within the Jyotish framework. In actuality, most of these utilized concepts from both (a) and (b) streams. There seemed to be some different people who entirely denied that the veracity of thought stream (b) and also a few were a bit taciturn about it, perhaps in order to prevent acrimony and getting ensnared in the controversy. Or perhaps there were several other causes, known only for them.